Every month, each client can receive one report from their practice. It explains how the business is doing, what to do about it, and how far the figures can be trusted. The practice reviews and approves every word before it reaches the client.
The report follows one rule: interpretation first, recommendations second, options last. It is an A4 PDF of eight pages, one section to a page. The PDF is tagged for screen readers: it is marked as South African English and has bookmarks, headings, table headers and a text version of each chart's figures.
| Page | Title on the page | What the client gets from it |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catalyst Platform report (the cover) | The health score and why, the five headline figures, the contents, and how to read the report |
| 2 | Executive summary and top priorities | The month in brief, and what to do first |
| 3 | Financial health | How the business is performing and what is driving the numbers |
| 4 | Cash and working capital | How much cash trading produced, and where it is tied up |
| 5 | Recommendations and 90-day action plan | The analysis turned into prioritised actions for management |
| 6 | Service providers | Service providers that could help carry out the recommendations, kept apart from the advice |
| 7 | Data reliability and method | Where the numbers come from, and how far to trust them |
| 8 | Appendix: how the findings were checked | Every check run on this month's figures, and what it found |
Every page carries the practice's name at the top, the reporting period, and a footer marked Confidential ("Prepared for the sole use of" the client) with the page number, the report version, the month and its approval state.
Numbers from: the month-end figures in the client's books. The health score combines profitability, liquidity, working capital, revenue quality, payroll and leverage, weighted as the practice has set them in Checks and scoring.
Numbers from: the findings the practice approved and the recommendations that follow from them. Impact ranges are worked out from the client's own figures, not from other businesses.
Numbers from: the client's profit and loss and balance sheet, month by month. Revenue growth compares the last three months with the same months a year earlier.
Numbers from: balance sheet movements between month-ends. Debtor, creditor and stock days use the last three months. If a month has no balances, the page says this chart can't be drawn rather than guessing.
Numbers from: each recommendation's range is calculated from the client's own figures, such as average daily revenue for faster debt collection, or monthly running costs for overhead savings. How each range was estimated is listed on page 7. An action whose value can't honestly be put in numbers, such as a cash forecast, says so.
Numbers from: nothing on pages 1 to 5 uses any service provider information. Service provider matches never change the findings or the recommendations.
When the data is weak: below 70, the health score is still shown, with a low-confidence badge and a note to read it with caution. A finding appears only when the figures are reliable enough to support it.
A table of every check, in words ("Debtor days up at least 5 days and at least 15% on last month"), with this month's result and why:
Checks used: the Catalyst Platform standard checks, or the practice's own rule set where one replaces them. The appendix says which.
Each section's wording comes from one of three places. In the practice's draft view, each is tagged so the reviewer knows what they are approving. The tags don't appear in the client's PDF.
| Tag in the draft | Means |
|---|---|
| Standard wording | Written from the figures by fixed wording rules. This is what the report uses unless Catalyst Platform switches AI drafting on. It is off in prod. |
| AI-drafted, figures checked | Drafted with AI from the figures, without the client's name or any identifying details; Catalyst Platform adds the name afterwards, never the AI service. Only the executive summary and the reasons given for recommendations are drafted this way. Every number is checked against the analysis. A section that fails the check twice keeps its standard wording. |
| Edited by the practice | Text an accountant wrote or changed in review. |
| Stage | Who | What happens | The report's footer says |
|---|---|---|---|
| Draft | Advisor or partner | Prepared from the month's figures and the findings reviewed so far, so it can be started before every finding is reviewed. The draft says how many are still to review; once they are, rebuild the draft to add them. It can be sent for approval only when every finding is reviewed and in it. Wording can be edited page by page; each edit saves a new version. Marked DRAFT across every page until it is approved. | Draft, not yet reviewed by your accountant |
| Sent for approval | Advisor or partner | The reviewer approves or asks for changes, with a comment the author sees. | Draft, in review with your accountant |
| Changes asked for | Advisor or partner | The author changes the wording and sends it for approval again. | Draft, being revised by your accountant |
| Approved | Advisor or partner; a partner if it contains tax, compliance or going-concern content | Approval belongs to that exact version; any later edit needs approving again. | Reviewed and approved by your accountant |
| Issued | Advisor or partner; a partner if it contains tax, compliance or going-concern content | The PDF is made and kept on record (in the EU in prod for now; in South Africa after the move to Cape Town). That version is locked and can't be changed. Nothing is sent to the client: the practice sends or presents it. | Reviewed and issued by your accountant |
| Archived | Partner | Takes an issued report out of view. The issued version and its PDF are kept as they were. | Replaced by a later version |